Sensed as opposed to reported personal referent recognition and you may connection partnership and you will work

Lover needs for the dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with an enchanting lover. Sociological Point of views, 49, 263-280. [ Links ]

Fiore, Good. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily inside the online dating: When can you like some body such as for instance yourself? CHI, appointment toward person circumstances into the computing options. 1317-1374. [ Backlinks ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you may incompatibility within the youngsters’ peer and you may cousin relationship. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible dating (pp. 61-87). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A beneficial. (2004). Birds from good feather otherwise strange wild birds? Ties certainly one of personality dimensions, resemblance, and ily Therapy, cuatro, 564-574. [ Website links ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Pair resemblance and you will relationship pleasure: Is comparable partners happier. Diary regarding Personality, 74, 1401-1420. [ Links ]

Goffman, Elizabeth. (1952). With the cooling the mark out: Specific part of version in order to inability. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Links ]

Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, overlap, and you can relationships pleasure in the matchmaking and you can maried people. Diary regarding Identity and you can Social Psychology, 93, 34-48. [ Website links ]

Personal Matchmaking, 15, 281-295

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The necessity of seems within the everyday life. Albany: County College or university of the latest York Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Complimentary theory. In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out-of individual dating (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]

Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Yards., & Existe, J. (1985). Guarantee and you may close interactions: Previous lookup. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible matchmaking (pp. 91-117). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you can sorting in internet dating. American Financial Remark, 100, 130-163. [ Hyperlinks ]

Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Manage online relationship assessment really works? A review off initial evidence to own a publicized ‘predictive make of erican Record away from Therapy, 6, 507-526. [ Website links ]

Houts, Roentgen. M., Robins, Age., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility and the growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Backlinks ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The early relationship origins of conjugal distress and you will splitting up. Latest Instructions in the Emotional Research, ten, 116-119. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Inclusion. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 1-7). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. Roentgen. Spanska kvinnlig (2009)patibility. From inside the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia regarding person dating (Vol. step one, pp. 283-286). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]

Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). The latest matching theory reexamined. Journal regarding Personality and Social Mindset, 51 , 673-682. [ Website links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The fresh longitudinal course of marital top quality and you may stability: A review of principle, measures, and lookup. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Website links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital telecommunications, therefore the trajectory of relationship fulfillment. Log of Personality and you will Personal Psychology, 72, 1075-1092. [ Hyperlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual impacts towards the wedding: Implications to possess rules and intervention. Latest Instructions in Psychological Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Website links ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A great., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Evaluating intimate relationships. During the H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Romantic relationship (pp. 20-67). Nyc: Freeman. [ Backlinks ]

Leave a Comment