Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-styears peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: « Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body »; « What do you wish you looked like? »; « What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion? »; « What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex? » Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (« actual »); Rtt= 0.77 (« ideal »); Rtt= 0.71 (« attractive »); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (« actual » and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weightloss restraint is measured by Weight reduction Scale of your own Dinner Thinking Attempt (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), comprised of 16 statements obtained towards the an effective six-part level (never = 0/constantly = 5), which have high scores exhibiting an advanced out of controlled restaurants. Towards the Eat psychometrical qualities find Garner et al. (1982). The latest texture coefficient both for trials, new Mexican and you will German of those, is actually of the same really worth, an alpha out-of 0.76.
Weight loss discipline
Ineffectiveness level. The brand new bad connect with factor is actually estimated from the Ineffectiveness Scale off this new Restaurants Disorders Index (EDI) (Gather et al., 1983), that has shown a beneficial convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) regarding Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Scientific group got the extra weight and you can top strategies
Body mass index (BMI). Body mass index was computed as the pounds for the kilograms split up from the peak inside the rectangular m (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Before study collection, a pilot study of the newest Silhouettes Scale (Shape step one), put on a sample consisting of 20 Mexican youngsters, was used to check the brand new appropriateness of data in order to depict muscles systems, so you can corroborate a good acceptation from an unidentified band of silhouettes and you can a definite understanding of the new information (new Italian language class currently mentioned which have investigation contained in this esteem). The outcome presented the brand new Outline Level try a https://internationalwomen.net/es/mujeres-marroquies/ great or an enthusiastic appropriate tool with the North american country sample.
The fresh detectives of these two nations, at Mexico Area at Hae (standardized) processes. The new questionnaires had been applied to categories of medical and you will breastfeeding college students in the North american country and you will Italian language universities. One of the reasons trailing the newest ples from pupils related to drug is actually only the desire you to (it’s possible to imagine) this type of young people need toward scientific community as well as health issues, leading them to even more tuned in to troubles like ED. Advised concur are extracted from every study professionals. Every called college students accessible to participate. The brand new respective regional ethics committees accepted new non-intrusive processes. Elite group translators undertook and you may managed the latest translation and you can retranslation of the tools.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for